Shortly after the brief intervention of the leader of the FLC-CGIL, Pantaleo, Senator George Stracquadanio, journalist and adviser to the minister Gelmini, contesting Brancatisano Vincent, author of the book "One Life to alternate," New Worlds in 2010, claimed to Rai Radio too (May 7, 2010) that he has never voted for or against a bill on the increase or decrease of the parliamentary allowance. But is it really? Stracquadanio in transmission had just young people accused of not wanting to give up their standard of living, preferring to stay at home with their parents instead of doing as he had done as a boy going off doing casual jobs. Brancatisano has recalled the senator himself, however, that in 2007 the Senate voted against a bill to reduce the salary and therefore the standard of living of members of parliament and therefore only ever asked the workers to make sacrifices. Stracquadanio could argue the merits, perhaps explaining that MPs earn too little, and yet, inexplicably, said in a broadcast which is contrary to reality. We read in the report of the parliamentary sitting of 8 November 2007, cited by Brancatisano, what had in fact declared Stracquadanio voting in Parliament (in fact!) NO to the bill in question: It 's the verbatim reports of the seat No 246, 08/11/2007:
'PRESIDENT. It has the power.
Stracquadanio (DCA-PRI-MPA). Mr. President, I asked to speak p er I voted against and strongly opposed - this proposal of Mr Turigliatto and all other similar proposals.
Mr. President, for too long in this country, next to an indecent demagoguery on what would be the cost of politics, nothing is written on the costs that poor policy is paid to the country, while the costs would be those of men of the institutions. For too tempo, accanto a questa demagogia, c'è una viltà dei parlamentari che si vergognano dell'incarico che hanno, delle loro attribuzioni e delle loro competenze.
Allora, Presidente, voglio fare un discorso molto semplice. Lei sa meglio di me - e i colleghi lo sanno - che con le nostre decisioni e i nostri voti decidiamo per l'indirizzo politico del Paese e per cifre enormi: quelle delle tasse dei nostri concittadini. È su quello che dovremmo applicare il massimo del rigore per evitare di buttare via i quattrini.
Inoltre, per questa responsabilità che avverto ogni minuto in cui esprimo un voto in quest'Aula ritengo che noi abbiamo una retribuzione inadeguata , insufficiente. In quale posto al mondo si ha una responsabilità of these, and have lower wages than managers of private or public or media company? A CEO of a media company earns much more than an elected official and all that I consider it normal and right in a free world. is indecent to the idea that the egalitarianism of the remunerations should lead those who have a responsibility to have this type of pay equal to those who have no such liability .
is indecent to think that there should be selection and attraction of the ruling class. I want a political system that pays so well, those who belong, to be set to enter the race among the best people in the country and not a leveling which it is entered, perhaps, for friendship or because it is under a master policy or under a consortium. So all this rigamarole
hypocritical policy would cost much more serious if they apply to the thousands of billions that are wasted in this budget, to the billions that were allocated by the government to buy the constituency groups and parliaments, to shopping of political consensus in this House.
Enough on the costs of political demagoguery . Finally we make a serious analysis rather than true costs and that the bad policy and this government are doing to pay the country. (Applause from the FI Group). "
Parliament Source: click here
0 comments:
Post a Comment